Skip to main content
MEDAL

Adversarial Anatomy Bench

Investigating whether AI models follow visual evidence when anatomy is unexpected

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly integrated into clinical workflows. However, existing benchmarks primarily assess performance on common anatomical presentations and fail to capture the challenges posed by rare variants.

To address this gap, we introduce Adversarial Anatomy Bench, the first benchmark comprising naturally occurring rare anatomical variants across diverse imaging modalities and anatomical regions. We call such variants that violate learned priors about “typical” human anatomy natural adversarial anatomy.

Benchmarking 25 state-of-the-art VLMs with Adversarial Anatomy Bench yielded three key insights. First, when queried with basic medical perception tasks, mean accuracy dropped from 71% on typical to 28% on atypical anatomy. Even the best-performing models, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Llama 4 Maverick, showed performance drops of 41-51%. Second, model errors closely mirrored expected anatomical biases. Third, neither model scaling nor interventions, including bias-aware prompting and test-time reasoning, resolved these issues. These findings highlight a critical limitation in current VLMs: their poor generalization to rare anatomical presentations. Adversarial Anatomy Bench provides a foundation for systematically measuring and mitigating anatomical bias in multimodal medical artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

The paper is currently under review, a preprint is accessible at this link.